Abstract
The uses and gratifications theory represents one of the key theories that contributed to the change of the theoretical paradigm regarding the maximum effects of the media on people. The theoretical question “What do the media do to people?” within this theory has been replaced by the question “What do people do with the media?”. Along with this theory, the concept of an “active audience” was also introduced. Specifically due to the interaction that they enable users to achieve, the uses and gratifications theory itself, as well as the concept of an active audience, have been reinterpreted in the era of digital media and social networks. In view of the aforementioned, the author believes that it is important to take a look back in time, particularly to the 1940s and highlight Herta Herzog’s groundbreaking research on the active role of media audiences, which were highly important to the team gathered around Paul Lazarsfeld and Elihu Katz when laying the foundations of the uses and gratifications theory.
References
Baran, S., & Davis, D. (2010). Mass communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future, sixth edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Curran, J., Gurevitch, M., & Woollacott, J. (2005). The study of the media: Theoretical approaches. In: M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran & J. Woollacott, Culture, society and the media. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 6–25.
Fiske, J. (2001). Television Culture: Popular Pleasures and Politics. Taylor & Francis eLibrary.
Herzog, H. (1940). Professor quiz: A gratification study. In: P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Radio and the printed page; an introduction to the study of radio and its role in the communication of ideas. New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce, 64–93.
Herzog, H. (1944). What do we really know about daytime serial listeners. Radio research, 1943, 3–33.
Hoerschelmann, O. (2006). Rules of the game: Quiz shows and American culture. Albany: SUNY Press.
Lin, C. A. (1996). Standpoint: Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz’s uses of mass communication to communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 574–581.
Merriam-Webster dictionary. Panglossian. URL: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/Panglossian. Posećeno: 24.08.2022.
Milivojević, S. (2001). Javnost i ideološki efekti medija. Reč – Časopis za književnost i kulturu i društvena pitanja, 64/10. URL: http://www.fabrikaknjiga.co.rs/knjige/casopis-rec/page/2/.
Noelle‐Neumann, E. (1983). The effect of media on media effects research. Journal of communication, 33(3), 157–165.
Papacharissi, Z. (2009). Uses and Gratifications. In: D. W. Stacks and M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, 137–152.
Pepitone, A. (1957). Book Review Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication (Book authors: E. Katz, P. F. Lazarsfeld & E. Roper). The American Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 157–158.
Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In: J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects – Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, 165–184.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass communication & society, 3(1), 3–37.
Schroder, K. C. (2013). Socio-cultural models of communication. In: P. Cobley & P. J. Schulz (Eds.), Theories and models of communication, volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 327–347.
Simonson, P. (2012). The rise and fall of the limited effects model. In: A. N. Valdivia (General Editor), The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies, Volume I: Media History and the Foundations of Media Studies (Edited by John Nerone). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sparks, G. (2012). Uses and Gratifications of Elihu Katz. In: E. Griffin (Ed.), A first look at communication theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 357–365.
Vreg, F. (1991). Demokratsko komuniciranje: prilog pluralističkoj paradigmi u komunikacijskoj nauci. Sarajevo: Narodna i univerzitetska biblioteka BiH Sarajevo.
