CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF OMRON BODY COMPOSITION MEASURING DEVICES IN KARATE ATHLETES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58984/smb2501069aKeywords:
body mass, percent of body fat, percent of skeletal muscle mass, OMRON BF 511, OMRON VIVAAbstract
The aim of this study was to examine the validity of two types of OMRON body composition analysers (BF 511 and VIVA) in comparison with the InBody 270 body composition analyser, in karatekas. The measurements were performed during the summer national camp of the FUDO-KAN Karate Federation, and the sample of subjects included 20 men and 27 women (Age = 16 ± 5.99 years; Body height = 158 ± 14.13 cm; Body mass = 51 ± 17.29 kg), and the following body composition variables were used: body mass (BM), body fat percentage (%BF) and skeletal muscle mass percentage (%SMM), which were estimated using all three body composition scales. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the coefficient of determination (r2) were used to determine the validity of both OMRON body composition analysers. A high correlation of BM InBody with BM OMRON (BF 511 – r 0.99, r2=0.99; VIVA – r=0.99, r2=0.99), %BF InBody with %BF BF 511 (r=0.92, r2=0.84), and %BF InBody with %BF VIVA (r=0.63, r2=0.40), %SMM InBody with %SMM BF 511 (r=0.68, r2=0.46) were observed. The results obtained indicate that there are certain deviations, especially when it comes to assessing skeletal muscle, when compared with the InBody 270 body composition scale.
Downloads
References
Aandstad, A., Holtberget, K., Hageberg, R., Holme, I., Anderssen, S. A. (2014). Validity and reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold thickness in predicting body fat in military personnel. Military Medicine, 179(2), 208-217.
Ciccone, G., Wootton, R., & Mahan, A. (2020). Comparison of body composition assessment methods: DXA and BIA. Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 102(3), 789-798.
Feng, Q., Bešević, J., Conroy, M., Omiyale, W., Lacey, B., & Allen, N. (2024). Comparison of body composition measures assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United Kingdom Biobank. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 63, 214-225.
Gaba, A., Kapus, O., Cuberek, R., & Botek, M. (2015). Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 28(4), 390–400.
Genton, L., Herrmann, F. R., Sporri, A., & Graf, C. E. (2017). Association of mortality and phase angle measured by different bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices. Clinical Nutrition, 36(5), 1490-1497.
Hopkins, W.G. (2015). Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience, 19, 36-42.
Kabiri, L. S., Hernandez, D. C., Mitchell, K. (2015). Reliability, validity, and diagnostic value of a pediatric bioelectrical impedance analysis scale. Childhood Obe-sity, 11(5), 650-655.
Larsen, M. N., Krustrup, P., Araújo Póvoas, S. C., Castagna, C. (2021). Accuracy and reliability of the InBody 270 multi-frequency body composition analyser in 10- 12-year-old children. PLoS One, 16(3), e0247362.
Lima, M. C. M., Silva, A. M., & Martins, S. A. (2020). BIA and DXA in the assessment of body composition: The importance of developing correction equations. BMC Physiology, 20(1), 14-19.
Ling, C. H. Y., Hartman, J., & Ho, J. (2011). Accuracy of bioelectrical impedance devices in body composition assessment. Obesity Reviews, 12(2), 133-145.
Leahy, S., O'Neill, C., Sohun, R., & Jakeman, P. (2012). A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(2), 589–595.
McLester, C. N., Nickerson, B. S., Kliszczewicz, B. M., McLester, J. R. (2020). Reliability and agreement of various InBody body composition analyzers as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy men and women. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 23(3), 443-450.
Nunes, M. L., Lima, M. L., & Vasconcelos, F. F. (2019). Evaluation of body composition methods in athletes: A review. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 18(3), 622-629.
Santos, H. L. G., Souza, L. D., & Costa, M. J. (2020). Bioelectrical impedance analysis for monitoring body composition in athletes: A systematic review. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 30(2), 121-130.
Silva, A. M., & Sardinha, L. B. (2019). Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA in older adults. PLoS ONE, 14(1), 1-13.
Silva, A. M., Sardinha, L. B., & Mota, J. (2018). Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA in older adults. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 21(3), 383-390.
Stojanović, D., Mandić, R., & Jovanović, S. (2017). Comparative analysis of different methods for body fat assessment in elementary school students. Research in Physical Education, Sport and Health, 6(2), 147-152.
Stewart, A. D., Marfell-Jones, M., Olds, T., & De Ridder, J. (1993). International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
Thurlow, S., Taylor-Covill, G., Sahota, P., Oldroyd, B., & Hind, K. (2017). Effects of procedure, upright equilibrium time, sex and BMI on the precision of body fluid measurements using bioelectrical impedance analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(1), 72–79.
Toskic, L., Markovic, M., Simenko, J., Vidic, V., Cikiriz, N., & Dopsaj, M. (2024). Analysis of Body Composition in Men and Women with Diverse Training Profiles: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Morphology, 42(5), 1278-1287.
Waki, K., Arima, N., Sato, M., Sato, Y., & Akahoshi, T. (1991). Body composition measurement using bioelectrical impedance analysis. The Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 64(4), 429–435.